Contact
We read every message carefully. We cannot promise a reply to every email, but serious, specific, well-considered questions will be prioritized.
No matter which mailbox you write to, we suggest that your email include three things: who you are, how you came to TRANTOR LABS, and what you want to discuss.
There is no need to follow a rigid format. Research feedback, conceptual questions, collaboration interests, policy discussions, media invitations, long-term support, funding and capital conversations, criticism, and suggestions are all welcome. We value genuine judgment and specific questions more than formal courtesy. The more specific your message is, the easier it is for us to route it to the right discussion path.
Please include in your email
- Who you are: a brief self-introduction is enough;
- How you came to TRANTOR LABS: which page, paper, essay, conversation, or question drew your attention;
- What you want to discuss: research feedback, collaboration interest, policy discussion, funding support, long-term capital, media invitation, criticism, suggestions, or another specific matter.
Choose the entry point that best matches your topic.
Each entry point corresponds to a different internal routing path. If you are not sure which mailbox to use, write to the general entry point.
Suitable for general inquiries, collaboration interests, media interviews, public writing, community exchange, intellectual feedback, and other questions that do not clearly fit another category.
This is the default entry point for most readers.
Suitable for researchers, academic institutions, members of the AI safety / alignment communities, PhD students, independent researchers, and technical reviewers.
If you want to discuss TRANTOR LABS papers, concepts, diagrams, argumentative structures, structural safety evidence, reality grounding, AGI safety, or related research directions, please write here.
Suitable for policymakers, regulators, public institutions, standards organizations, AI governance / AI assurance teams, industry organizations, and practitioners in high-sensitivity domains.
If you want to discuss how AGI safety can enter policy, standards, audit, responsibility boundaries, AI assurance, or governance frameworks, please write here.
Suitable for philanthropic foundations, public-interest research funders, longtermist supporters, strategic funding partners, mission-aligned long-term capital partners, and those concerned with the sustainability of AGI safety, alignment, governance, and human existential risk research.
If you want to support TRANTOR LABS' long-term research, system-level embodiment, trustworthy AGI infrastructure, AI assurance, open-source ecosystem, or public uptake, please write here.